On Sat, Oct 28, 2017, at 02:51, Matthew Brett wrote: > As Ralf said - we did do some work to try and remove references to > "safe", exactly because it refers to that particular culture, on which > we certainly do not have consensus. But - if you think we didn't do > that effectively enough, please do feel free to give a PR to the Scipy > code of conduct, or put up a PR for your own version to scikit-image. > In this case, I do think it has a lot to do with wording.
I think it would be worth raising specific phrasing issues here on the mailing list, so that we can examine them individually. I started this conversation because I think the SciPy CoC is different from many others I've seen, in that it does not make many of the choices in wording others do and tries to be cognizant of the wide array of political opinions and cultural norms present. As I stated in a previous email, not writing rules down does not mean they do not exist implicitly. Best regards Stéfan _______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
