Ok here’s my suggested course of action, inspired in part by the movie The Life of David Gale:
1) Apply for a grant to fund steps 2-5. 2) Make a BSD-licensed library that imports fftw 2b) (optional) sell the library for $500/license. 3) Convince the makers of FFTW to sue. We would pay all legal costs from (1) 4) Put *most* of the funds from (1) towards the defense legal costs, though. 5) Win the lawsuit, thereby creating the required legal precedent and providing a massive boost to the BSD-licensed SciPy ecosystem. Any takers? ;) Juan. On 2 Nov 2017, 6:51 PM +1100, Stefan van der Walt <stef...@berkeley.edu>, wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017, at 00:26, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > The FSF is definitely guilty of oversimplifying this, but it's > > probably best to think of their position as a simple bright-line rule > > of thumb, like... if you follow this rule you're definitely safe, and > > if you don't follow this rule... well, it's complicated and ultimately > > it might depend on what the jury had for lunch that day, so good luck. > > Or at least you should ask an actual lawyer :-) > > Should we not also ask: if we got sued, would an argument along the > lines of "yes, I know you've explicitly stated publicly that you meant > *this* with your license, but we prefer interpreting it like *that*" > fly? I have no idea how courts interpret these things, but if a > reasonable expectation was set, I can't see how ignoring it would > benefit us. > > Until there's absolute clarity, or a confirmation from the authors or > the FSF that importing FFTW is OK, I wouldn't go there. > > Stéfan > _______________________________________________ > scikit-image mailing list > scikit-image@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
