Hi all,

I'd also support this decision.
For information, here is an another link to a related discussion -
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/scikit-image/7aH6hshJJg0/ykjxdZ8uMQAJ
.

Juan,
I don't think we're there yet for 1.0, though :). From my standpoint,
several important aspects (metaparams handling, API, xy->rc, etc) have to
be addressed first (see `discussion` tag on GitHub).

Stefan,
Has the schedule been changed? I remember we were planning to release 0.14
in November 2017 (see
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/2017-September/005352.html).

Regards,
Egor Panfilov

2017-11-12 2:55 GMT+03:00 Juan Nunez-Iglesias <jni.s...@gmail.com>:

> I agree. I would suggest backporting bugfixes to 0.14 for 2 years, or not
> naming it LTS because 1y is not “long term” by most definitions.
>
> imho we should aim for 1.0 for this time next year and maybe *that* can
> depend on Python >= 3.6. =)
>
> Juan.
>
> On 11 Nov 2017, 6:52 PM +1100, imag...@sina.com, wrote:
>
> Just my own opinion. we can give up python2.x      -- YXDragon
> ----- 原始邮件 -----
> 发件人:Stefan van der Walt <stef...@berkeley.edu>
> 收件人:scikit-image@python.org
> 主题:[scikit-image] Python 3 transition
> 日期:2017年11月11日 14点34分
>
> Hi, everyone
> I'd like to make a 4th attempt to determine our transition pathway to
> Python 3. The last thread is here:
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/2017-July/005304.html
> I would like to propose that the next version, 0.14 (scheduled for March
> of next year), becomes the last targeted for Python 2. It will also be
> an LTS (Long Time Support), which means we will backport serious fixes
> for a period of one year. 0.15 will then target Python >= 3.5 only
> (sorry, no f-strings yet!).
> Let me know your thoughts.
> Stéfan
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
>
>
_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image

Reply via email to