Hi Juan, On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:33:21 +1100 Juan Nunez-Iglesias <jni.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds great! I’ll admit that I’m not confident in this area either, > but my reading of the documentation suggests that this is the right > approach: the damping controls the square norm of x. By keeping it > small (with large damping), you force the elements to be non-negative. The approach looks OK, I am just a bit "unconfident" about tweeking a factor to get the image I am expecting. Not very scientific when the resulting image has to used as input for quantitative analysis. > I hope the final picture looks good now! =) If you get a nice result, > I suggest you write a blog post about it, with pictures. It sounds > like a very cool use of SciPy, and would be a valuable addition to > writeups about it! This will be part of the documentation of pyFAI by the end of the year: http://pyfai.readthedocs.io/en/latest/usage/tutorial/index.html To Stefan, I am sorry I forgot about your PhD work. I will check again your work, last time it was a different topic :) Cheers, Jerome _______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
