Hi Sourav, Yes, improving performance is something that’s in the roadmap (this roadmap exists only in the heads of several core developers — something else that needs to be rectified). It just hasn’t been emphasised for lack of developer time.
A very specific goal that I’ve had for a while is to set up integration for the project with airspeed velocity. Once we have that, the performance of the library should progressively improve, simply by having performance be a more visible goal. For this, we need a dedicated machine to run benchmarks. Stéfan, do you think you could make/host one at BIDS? Juan. On 19 Nov 2017, 1:15 AM +1100, Sourav Singh <ssouravsing...@gmail.com>, wrote: > Hello, > > I am writing the mail with reference to the tweet made by Jeremy Howard here- > https://twitter.com/jeremyphoward/status/931761385628778496 > > Here, he did an image rotation for all the existing image processing > libraries in Python and noted that vips is better than scipy in terms of > speed. > > I am interested to know if there is anything that could be done regarding the > problem. > > > Regards, > > Sourav > _______________________________________________ > scikit-image mailing list > scikit-image@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
