I would really, really like for us to have flood fill in this release. Particularly if it's going to be the last with some backwards compatibility. It would help with tutorials - actually the panorama tutorial is now broken without it without an acceptable workaround other than shipping a flood fill with the tutorial - and is so basic yet essential we have very little excuse to still be lacking this.
There was discussion about implementing it recently, but I think that's still pending. I will make a PR with a basic, 2D uint8 flood fill in Cythob by tomorrow. There are definitely improvements that can be made in speed & generalization, but let's at least have the very basic algorithm in 0.14 so we can backport improvements. Josh On Mon, May 21, 2018, 09:46 Egor Panfilov <egor.v.panfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Juan, > > Yes, I'm still willing to be a release manager. > I agree with you that, despite having a moderate list of open issues > [softly] scheduled for 0.14, we should go ahead and make a release. The > master branch holds a ton of fascinating additions, and it is way far ahead > of 0.13.1 already. > > My suggestion would be to wait couple of days so that the maintainers > could review 0.14 milestone and catch up with the issues they consider > critical for 0.14. Once everything is set, we (I might need your > assistance, @jni :)) can make a release (this Thursday or Friday). > > Regards, > Egor > > пн, 21 мая 2018 г. в 15:57, Juan Nunez-Iglesias <j...@fastmail.com>: > >> Hello list, >> >> Tomorrow I am going to do one last pass at the 0.14 milestone and then >> release 0.14. As a reminder, 0.14.x will be a LTS release, the last skimage >> version compatible with Python 2.7, and it will receive important backports >> (bug fixes, critical performance improvements, and maybe even a new feature >> or two, based principally on community demand). >> >> Given how long we have been planning this release, I think we have >> reached the point where we should release what we have rather than hold it >> up for every last PR that we want in it. Many users have requested this >> release, and it is particularly important for our Windows users that may >> not have a complete developer toolchain to build from source, and have a >> difficult time accessing the features that have made it onto master in the >> past year. >> >> If you have any strong objections to pushing this out, please voice them >> now. >> >> Egor, you twice mentioned wanting to be release manager for this release. >> (Sorry that I was not more available to help on those occasions.) I’m happy >> to let you do this one if you still want to, but I’m also happy to do it >> myself. Let me know your preference. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Juan. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-image mailing list >> scikit-image@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image >> > _______________________________________________ > scikit-image mailing list > scikit-image@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image >
_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
