On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Brian Holt <[email protected]> wrote:
> If it is of interest, then the obvious question is: do we roll our own
> or do we wrap an existing implementation?
>
> [InferNet](http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/cambridge/projects/infernet/)
> has IronPython bindings, but is probably not suitable for wrapping in
> scikit-learn.  [libDAI](http://cs.ru.nl/~jorism/libDAI/doc/) seems to
> be a possibility for wrapping in much the same way as libSVM.

The DAI license is BSD, so that's good.  I'm not sure what the
scikit-learn policy on including C++ code is, though.

Almero Gouws and Helge Reikeras worked on graphical models for a
while, and produced this:

http://dip.sun.ac.za/~hreikeras/grmpy_doc/contents.html

I have no idea about the quality or efficiency of the code, but feel
free to use and modify it.

Regards
Stéfan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BlackBerry&reg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
Learn about the latest advances in developing for the 
BlackBerry&reg; mobile platform with sessions, labs & more.
See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry&reg; DevCon today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

Reply via email to