2011/9/30 Gael Varoquaux <[email protected]>: > Yes. In addition, undertested and breaks the API of the scikit. The reason is > that it doesn't get used much as is developped only by a small fraction of > the development team. > > This is actually an example of why I don't want application-specific code in > the scikit: such code is bound to evolve somewhat in isolation. I am not > saying that this code should go. I am saying that I don't want it to grow > much.
Actually my goal is to simplify it with less intermediate classes and hence reduce the amount of code. -- Olivier http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
