> Actually, I hadn't realized, but 'permutation_test_score' is named > 'score', and it does not follow the 'bigger is better rule'. So, in > addition to there being a documentation problem, there is a consistency > problem.
unless you see it as a permutation test on a score. It's not a score function by itself. > I think that I would favor changing it so that it returns -log(p) (yay, > another API breakage :$ ). not really convinced as for permutations you're unlikely have numerical underflows. and I prefer - log10(p) for p-values. > What do people think? maybe rename the function but keep the behavior. Alex a bit biased as he wrote this ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
