Yes, I was thinking of a sequencial, exploratory IPython-style thing where you change something in your X and re-fit, when you don't want to clone and delete the old estimator. Hope this makes sense.
Vlad > 2011/11/6 Lars Buitinck <[email protected]>: >> 2011/11/6 Vlad Niculae <[email protected]>: >>> This is exactly what I would expect as well. I think this is the >>> biggest gain of having objects instead of functions: being able to >>> store init parameters in an object that you will then fit and evaluate >>> on different sets. >> >> Isn't that what base.clone is for? > > clone is just for cloning (e.g. for processing with the same initial > parameters on different data in parrallel). > > > -- > Olivier > http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > Scikit-learn-general mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
