GraphLasso seems really neat (and the associated CV object should
prove very useful).

I had a look at the stock market example but I am a bit confused by
the fact that the clustering, graph structure and 2d-embedding seemed
to be learned independently although they are clearly related
problems. I see that the (dense) correlation matrix is used as input
to affinity propagation. Wouldn't it be better if we used the partial
correlations learned by GraphLasso directly? This way, the cluster
centers and the edge structure would be more related. Likewise, the
graph structure and the clustering are not used at all for learning
the embedding, which seems like a pity. Also, I wonder if once we have
the graph structure, couldn't we get away with just using a graph
drawing algorithm?

Mathieu

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

Reply via email to