On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:27:10PM +0100, Olivier Grisel wrote: > Alternatively we could make a vocabulary dict implementation > based on a redis server.
That's two mails in a row suggesting to bing the scikit with an advanced persistence engine: first Dimitrios suggesting to persist to pytables, and then you suggesting reddis. In general, I don't think that it is good to bind the scikit with a specific store: different stores will suit different people. What we could do is have a simple API that enables persistence. I would like to walk slowly in this direction, as it is quite easy to make overly-complex and specific designs. I think that we need at least one full-working implementation to study before we can make decisions and start merging in the scikit. Gael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
