On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Alexandre Gramfort <[email protected]> wrote: >> I agree that it's a good idea to correct C for sample size when moving >> from a sub-problem to the full thing. I just wouldn't use the word >> "optimal" to describe the new value of C that you get this way - it's >> an extrapolation, a good guess... possibly provably better than the >> un-corrected value of C, but I would balk at claiming that it's >> optimal. > > I fully agree. With scaling it's a more reasonable guess. > Can you let me know where I should rephrase and avoid the word "optimal".
I don't see it in the docs. I thought I saw it in your email yesterday, but reading it again, I realize that's not necessarily what you meant there either. Sorry for mis-quoting you, - James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
