On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:10:51PM +0200, bthirion wrote: > - "Hierarchical clustering -> Few clusters": I thought it was not the > best use case for these algorithms
Yes, this is clearly a typo. > - "Hierarchical clustering -> even cluster size": this is not true if > you consider single linkage, or even in general with Ward Granted. > - You should at least refer to GMMs, as this is the most popular > clustering framework that comes with a natural probabilistic setting Agreed. > - In the comparison table, you could also point that some methods > require some -a priori random- initialization, while others do not. Maybe, but I can hardly add a column. > - "Geometry -> Distances between points": I'd rather call the column > "Metric" and set it to "Euclidean" or "graph-based" Sure > - With mean shift, I would refer to 'modes' rather than 'blobs'. OK, Thanks for the feedback, Gael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
