On 07/16/2012 09:55 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:13:55PM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
>> How do folks feel about using this sort of bleeding-edge cython syntax
>> in scikit-learn?
> I wouldn't mind waiting another year: it's not like we don't have plenty
> of things to do, and there is no urgency.
>
> That's my typical response of the guy who is advert to risk :). What do
> others think?
>
First, I'd like some benchmarks.
The functionality is marked as "experimental", which probably means
we should wait.

Third, if they are as fast as the pointer stuff we are doing right now,
then we should probably switch all the code to the new interface.
That seems like a lot of work. As Gael said, there is already
quite a lot to do.

Andy

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

Reply via email to