On 10/26/2012 04:21 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > The title says it all: the last modification to the precision-recall > implies that if the second argument to the precision-recall function is > not bettwen 0 and 1, the code gives non-sensical results without a > warning. It used to work. Which PR was that. That is bad :-( > I suggest to change it back to working with any non-bounded test > statistic. Any reason not to? I am proposing to do the work. +1 > Cheers, > > Gaël > > PS: I've been overhauling a code that was written last February, using > the scikit-learn to work with the latest version, and its broken in many > subtle ways (like the one that I am mentionning in this email) due to > subtle changes in behavior in the scikit. :( Will send pull requests for > all. > We should really be more careful....
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Windows 8 Center In partnership with Sourceforge Your idea - your app - 30 days. Get started! http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ what-html-developers-need-to-know-about-coding-windows-8-metro-style-apps/ _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
