Do they use the same value for the min_samples_split parameter? I see they use a default value (hidden in their constructor I guess), but theirs might not be the same as ours.
Gilles On 28 November 2012 16:29, Andreas Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 28.11.2012 16:19, schrieb Peter Prettenhofer: >> Some more benchmarks from wise.io: >> >> http://continuum.io/blog/wiserf-use-cases-and-benchmarks >> >> quite impressive indeed - unfortunately I cannot post any comments on >> the blog - I wonder if they use some sort of binned split evaluation >> [1] instead of exact split evaluation (wiseRF has slightly lower >> accuracy scores). > Yeah, that has been on the pipeline. To do that, we need the lazy evaluation > by Brian. I didn't get around to code it and neither did he. > Feel free ;) > > Without the binning, Brian's code seemed to be a bit slower. > > Feel free to try it ;) > > Andy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: > INSIGHTS What's next for parallel hardware, programming and related areas? > Interviews and blogs by thought leaders keep you ahead of the curve. > http://goparallel.sourceforge.net > _______________________________________________ > Scikit-learn-general mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: INSIGHTS What's next for parallel hardware, programming and related areas? Interviews and blogs by thought leaders keep you ahead of the curve. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
