+1 on single codebase support. As Olivier Grisel mentionned, this is not that hard, and I have bitten the bullet with joblib.
Also +1 on waiting for the next release. G On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 01:02:10PM -0800, Jake Vanderplas wrote: > Just a quick heads-up: thanks to some good work by Pauli Virtanen, SciPy > is currently in the process of moving to a single code-base which > supports 2.x and 3.x, and it doesn't look extremely difficult. It makes > use of the `six` compatibility module, which is lightweight enough to be > bundled with the Scipy source (see https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/397) > I think that this would be a reasonable thing to try to accomplish for > the next scikit-learn release. Taking the lead with SciPy on Python 2/3 > compatibility could have a very positive ripple effect through the > python/ML community. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
