Am 18.01.2013 17:25, schrieb Lars Buitinck: > 2013/1/18 Mathieu Blondel <math...@mblondel.org>: >> Modules I would consider for removal are gaussian processes, >> semi-supervised learning and HMMs. We could move them to a >> scikit-learn-bleeding-edge repository. > +1 for getting rid of the HMMs; I never liked their API, and the > MultinomialHMM in particular is quite useless (as the docs admit). I'm also +1 on removing the HMMs as they do have a completely different API and try to deal with sequences - I'd say sequences are out of the scope of sklearn.
I don't see the problem with semi-supervised algorithm actually. The API is pretty straight-forward and there are well-established algorithms like self-taught learning. For GP: Someone volunteered on the ML recently to take a shot at them. Let's wait and see, I would say. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
