On 02/14/2013 03:59 PM, David Reed wrote:
> I dont think this is the problem.  My data is definetly oversampled, I 
> have 5000 samples for the 1 feature.
>
> I also should say that the problem that led be to LDA was seeing there 
> was a large bias between SVM classification accuracy in sklearn and 
> matlab.  I am using the same parameters on both, and again testing on 
> my training.  Using the same univariate data set, I see 0.63 from 
> matlab and 0.58 from sklearn.
>
Which version of scikit-learn are you using? Are you using sparse matrices?
There was a weird bug in using sparse matrices and SVMs in an earlier 
version of sklearn.
If there is still a discrepancy in either of the algorithms, we must 
investigate!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

Reply via email to