+1 for the table of algorithms as discussed from a previous thread
+1 also for the top level menu items, for a flatter hierarchy.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Andreas Mueller <amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de>wrote:
> On 03/04/2013 10:59 PM, Robert Layton wrote:
> > Sounds like some great changes.
> >
> > For the algorithms, I would recommend splitting by application. Rather
> > than "Supervised learning" and "Unsupervised learning", have:
> > - Classification
> > - Regression
> > - Feature Selection
> > - Feature Reduction/Creation
> > - Clustering
> > - Optimising Parameters
> > - Evaluating
> > - Text Mining
> >
> > and so on...
> > Given, under Andy's suggestions, that algorithms would become a more
> > focused part of the site, the increase in the number of headings
> > shouldn't matter too much. (also, it's flatter)
> >
> Under "Algorithms" I envisioned the table of estimators, which I think
> we agreed should be organized as you suggested :)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
> _______________________________________________
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
