On 06/01/2013 11:43 PM, o m wrote: > Andy, on reading your tip, and reflecting on what I do, I'm tempted to > claim > that standardization is very important, regardless ... > > Assume x0 is very important but has a tiny range (-1/100, 1/100) I think that something with a tiny range can be more "important" than other variables with a larger range is a modelling assumption. In that case you should standardize. If all variables "have the same scale" this shouldn't happen, I think.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
