2013/6/17 Lars Buitinck <[email protected]>: > 2013/6/17 Andreas Mueller <[email protected]>: >> On 06/17/2013 04:46 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: >>>> With a long enough deprecation cycle, I'm +1. >>> I am -1 because I like the flexibility of the bunch-like object. However, >>> I think that we could move to a dictionary. >>> >> We could also use a named tuple. >> That would also support unwrapping, so we could have flexibility but >> could also directly access the content. > > Named what, Bunch? :p
The Bunch class does not allow the following oneliner: X, y = load_iris()[:2] while a namedtuple would as the attributes are ordered in a namedtuple. That being said, if Bunch were to derive from http://docs.python.org/2/library/collections.html#collections.OrderedDict we could make it work. But that would require us to backport OrderedDict in sklearn/utils/fixes.py to keep python 2.6 compat. -- Olivier http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
