On 02/05/2014 06:40 PM, Kyle Kastner wrote:
> Not to bandwagon extra things on this particular effort, but one 
> future consideration is that if scikit-learn supported multilayer 
> neural networks, and eventually multilayer convolutional neural 
> networks, it would become feasible to load pretrained nets ALA 
> OverFeat, DeCAF (recent papers with sweet results) and use them as 
> transforms.
>
> I am doubtful about the ability to train a reasonably deep neural 
> network without GPU, specialized hardware, or a server, but I think 
> loading pretrained coefficients and using them as a transform is very 
> reasonable. It may be too "messy" for adoption in scikit-learn, but an 
> adapter layer could be very useful - I know this is basically what I 
> and other competitors used for a recent kaggle competition with great 
> success.
>
>
That was convolutional nets for images, right? Or did you have some 
other pretrained net?
I don't think convnets for images are in the scope, and an adaptor 
should rather live in a project like DeCAF.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

Reply via email to