Is this necessary for new PCA methods as well? In other words, should I add
an already deprecated constructor arg to IncrementalPCA as well, or just do
the whitening inverse_transform the way it will be done in 0.16 and on?
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Gael Varoquaux <
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 02:38:41PM +0200, Alexandre Gramfort wrote:
> > I would be +1 adding an invert_whitening param to PCA that would
> > default to False in 0.15 and move to True in 0.16 to eventually
> > disappear later.
>
> +1
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
> _______________________________________________
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
