Mario, as I said, the correct would be:
- AUC = (1 + TP_rate - FP_rate) / 2
But you are also right, that is another evaluation metric stated in those
references I sent!
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Mario Michael Krell <kr...@uni-bremen.de>
wrote:
> 1-FN_rate = TN_rate
>
> Concequently, (1 + TP_rate - FN_rate)/ 2 should be named "Balanced
> Accuracy" to avoid misunderstandings. Nevertheless, it is a good choice.
>
>
> On 23.07.2014, at 18:57, Dayvid Victor <victor.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Or you might use the trapezoid aproximation: auc = (1 + TP_rate -
> FN_rate)/ 2
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
> search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
> Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
> search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
> _______________________________________________
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
>
--
*Dayvid Victor R. de Oliveira*
PhD Candidate in Computer Science at Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE)
MSc in Computer Science at Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE)
BSc in Computer Engineering - Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
