On 12/28/2014 01:30 AM, Christopher Moody wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your suggestions! Great to see that it should a 
> good inclusion & happy to see so much excitement around it! Nick and I 
> will likely submit a PR once we've shown that it's performant and 
> we've got a script others can run to get started.
>
> Also, while we've experimented with prange-loops in the BH t-SNE code, 
> they actually turn out to be slower than single-threaded loops. I was 
> hoping for a quick way to parallelism, but it looks like the prange 
> for-loops in fact run more slowly.

I guess that is good news in this case, as it will make inclusion much 
easier :)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

Reply via email to