Andreas Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, C-Means is pretty established, but I'm not sure about the benefits > compared to > a diagonal covariance GMM.
It is numerically the same, except the implied pdf is different. c-means can be faster as it does not need to evaluate trancendental functions, e.g. if fuzzy memberships are computed with a Bartlet window, but it might still yield almost the same result. Sturla ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
