Dear Andreas,

Thanks a lot for your help,

about the random assignment of values to my labels y. What I mean is that being 
suspicious about the too good performances, I changed the labels manually, 
retaining the 50% 1,0 but in different orders, and the labels were always 
predicted very well, with accuracy no lower than 60%. I mean, by chance I 
aspected values lower than 50% as well as values higher than 50%. I didn't 
perform an exhaustive test (I only did it manually for few combinations)...

Fabrizio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

Reply via email to