Haven't try to tune the parameters of the combined normal data though (dont
know why i forget that..)
I'll do that.
Thanks Andy

Regards,
Ady

On Wednesday, August 5, 2015, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Do you have ground-truth? Then you should tune the parameters.
> Have you done that?
>
>
> On 08/04/2015 01:45 PM, Ady Wahyudi Paundu wrote:
> > Hi Andy, thank you for the swift reply.
> >
> > No, for both case I was using the same set of parameters (nu and gamma
> > = 0.01, kernel=rbf)
> >
> > Thank you for your suggestion, I will look into it.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ady
> >
> > On 8/5/15, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> Hi Ady.
> >> Are you selecting parameters separately for the two models in the
> >> separate case?
> >> Btw, if you are modelling a single normal, maybe EllipticEnvelope would
> >> work better.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Andy
> >>
> >> On 08/04/2015 01:07 PM, Ady Wahyudi Paundu wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> How am I supposed to work with multiple set of normal data for
> one-class
> >>> SVM?
> >>> If I have two normal scenario data set, A and B for learning phase,
> >>> should I create predictor model separately (M(A) + M(B)) or can I
> >>> combine A and B to create just a single predictor model (M(A+B))?
> >>>
> >>> I have try both approach using one-class SVM in scikit-learn, and my
> >>> results shows that FPR for combined normal data set is significantly
> >>> higher (more than 30% in average) than separate prediction (suggesting
> >>> that separate prediction is better than combined prediction). I just
> >>> want to confirmed this findings, is that how it supposed to be?
> >>>
> >>> Are there any way to improved combined prediction model for one-class
> >>> SVM?
> >>>
> >>> Thank you in advance.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Ady
> >>>
> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> >>> Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net <javascript:;>
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> >> Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net <javascript:;>
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
> >>
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> > Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net <javascript:;>
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net <javascript:;>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

Reply via email to