This is pretty clear from the inclusion of Fabian, who would have probably dropped out
of the window otherwise.
So as far as "truck-factor" goes, I think he is not actively maintaining the project that much any more.


On 08/12/2015 09:24 AM, Guilherme Avelino wrote:
Hi Josef,

In our study we took the entire history.

2015-08-12 10:13 GMT-03:00 <josef.p...@gmail.com <mailto:josef.p...@gmail.com>>:



    On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Matthew Brett
    <matthew.br...@gmail.com <mailto:matthew.br...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        Hi,

        On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Guilherme Avelino
        <gavel...@gmail.com <mailto:gavel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
        > As part of my PhD research on code authorship, we calculated
        the Truck
        > Factor (TF) of some popular GitHub repositories.
        >
        > As you probably know, the Truck (or Bus) Factor designates
        the minimal
        > number of developers that have to be hit by a truck (or
        quit) before a
        > project is incapacitated. In our work, we consider that a
        system is in
        > trouble if more than 50% of its files become orphan (i.e.,
        without a main
        > author).



    Does this take the entire history into account, or is there a
    rolling window?
    My impression is that many developers get hit by jobs (not by
    trucks) and have to largely drop out of the main development.

    Josef

        >
        > More details on our work in this preprint:
        https://peerj.com/preprints/1233
        >
        > We calculated the TF for scikit-learn and obtained a value of 7.
        >
        > The developers responsible for this TF are:
        >
        > Fabian Pedregosa - author of 22% of the files
        > Gael varoquaux - author of 13% of the files
        > Andreas Mueller - author of 12% of the files
        > Olivier Grisel - author of 10% of the files
        > Lars Buitinck - author of 10% of the files
        > Jake Vanderplas - author of 6% of the files
        > Vlad Niculae - author of 5% of the files
        >
        > To validate our results, we would like to ask scikit-learn
        developers the
        > following three brief questions:
        >
        > (a) Do you agree that the listed developers are the main
        developers of
        > scikit-learn?
        >
        > (b) Do you agree that scikit-learn will be in trouble if the
        listed
        > developers leave the project (e.g., if they win in the
        lottery, to be less
        > morbid)?

        Wouldn't winning the lottery mean the developers would have _more_
        time to devote to scikit-learn ?

        :)

        Matthew

        
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        _______________________________________________
        Scikit-learn-general mailing list
        Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
        <mailto:Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general



    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    Scikit-learn-general mailing list
    Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general




--
Prof. Guilherme Amaral Avelino
Universidade Federal do Piauí
Departamento de Computação


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

Reply via email to