Thanks for all the answers.
Then the fault is probably due to the overfitting of OCSVM.
I was probably mislead by the title of my reference paper "*Estimating
*the *support
*of a *high*-*dimensional *distribution"
<http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/089976601750264965>

Best,
Luca


On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:10 PM Gael Varoquaux <
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 01:18:19PM +0000, Luca Puggini wrote:
> > I was expecting OCSVM to be not too much influenced by the increasing
> number of
> > variables even if some of them are irrelevant.
>
> I am not: it's based on an RBF kernel. These things are not well behaved
> in high dimensions.
>
> Gaƫl
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
-- 

Sent by mobile phone
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

Reply via email to