Oh, nice, that’s good to know! Many thanks! > On Nov 13, 2015, at 5:58 AM, Gilles Louppe <g.lou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > Yes. This is intentional. The motivation comes from > http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1#/page-1 > where it is shown experimentally that is a good default value on > average. > > Gilles > > On 13 November 2015 at 11:17, Sebastian Raschka <se.rasc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> it’s probably intended, but I just wanted to mention that I just saw that >> the RandomForestRegressor defaults are set to “regular” bagging for >> regression. >> >> • If “auto”, then max_features=n_features. >> >> http://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.ensemble.RandomForestRegressor.html >> >> Is this intentional? >> >> Best, >> Sebastian >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Scikit-learn-general mailing list >> Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Scikit-learn-general mailing list > Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
