Artem <[email protected]> wrote:
> The paper is quite new, and sklearn has a policy
> <<a
> href="http://scikit-learn.org/stable/faq.html#can-i-add-this-new-algorithm-that-i-or-someone-else-just-published";>http://scikit-learn.org/stable/faq.html#can-i-add-this-new-algorithm-that-i-or-someone-else-just-published</a>>
> about introducing new algorithms. I'd say we need more time for others to
> test it and prove its usefulness.
In computer science there is a word for "dumping ground for algorithms or
code that I or someone else just published or found remotely useful":
OpenSSL
And we all know how that ended: An enourmous flying spaghetti monster
embedded in a big grunch of pragmas and preprocessor macros that the
maintainers of OpenBSD describes as:
#pragma summon cthulhu
And thus it died. Or should have been put to sleep.
Adding all sorts of new stuff is never useful in the long run.
Sturla
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
