On 03/25/2016 11:11 AM, Raghav R V wrote: > Hey Maniteja, > > I took a look at your proposal. As I said before I feel it is a bit > broad and you should try to narrow it down to a good theme. > > Since you have chosen more than one PRs which are missing value > related, I have a suggestion for a theme - > > "Better Missing Value Handling" > > You could group the knn imputation, matrix factorization with missing > values and *outputting dummy one-hot encoded features for imputer to > specify if the feature value is imputed or not. Implementing these > properly and merging should be sufficient for a GSoC I feel. As an > optional thing, you could add another imputation strategy. > > *I'll raise an issue so you understand that better. +1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785351&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
