> "nag if needed"! I always assume it to be an implicit advice ;P
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Andreas Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, I've been off review duty for a while, should be back later this > summer ;) > > > On 06/21/2016 12:09 AM, olologin wrote: > >> Hi guys, I know scikit-learn may not be your main project, and you all >> are very busy at work so you don't have free time to review all pull >> requests, I understand it. >> >> Is there something project leaders can do to speed-up review process? >> Because I have bunch of pull requests which I made 5-7 months ago, and they >> are relatively useful :), but they wasn't reviewed. Some of them are quite >> simple for review (~10 lines in python), and still have only 1 vote. Maybe >> it's possible to increase size of team which have permission to review? Or >> all I can do is just wait? :) >> >> I'm writing this letter because yesterday one guy complained about this >> in one of my PR's (I forgot about that PR by the time) >> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/6116#issuecomment-227044224 >> . >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-learn mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >> > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
