On 08/27/2016 02:19 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Can I update the libsvm version by myself?
2016-08-27 12:49 GMT+03:00 olologin <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
On 08/27/2016 12:33 PM, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
I have a project that is based on SVM algorithm implemented by
libsvm <https://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/%7Ecjlin/libsvm/>. Recently I
decided to try several other classification algorithm, this is
where scikit-learn <http://scikit-learn.org/> comes to the picture.
The connection to the scikit was pretty straightforward, it
supports libsvm format by |load_svmlight_file| routine. Ans it's
svm implementation is based on the same libsvm.
When everything was done, I decided to the check the consistence
of the results by directly running libsvm and via scikit-learn,
and the results were different. Among 18 measures in learning
curves, 7 were different, and the difference is located at the
small steps of the learning curve. The libsvm results seems much
more stable, but scikit-learn results have some drastic fluctuation.
The classifiers have exactly the same parameters of course. I
tried to check the version of libsvm in scikit-learn
implementation, but I din't find it, the only thing I found was
libsvm.so file.
Currently I am using libsvm 3.21 version, and scikit-learn 0.17.1
version.
I wound appreciate any help in addressing this issue.
|size libsvm scikit-learn 1 0.1336239435355727 0.1336239435355727
2 0.08699516468193455 0.08699516468193455 3 0.32928301642777424
0.2117238289550198 #different 4 0.2835688734876902
0.2835688734876902 5 0.27846766962743097 0.26651875338163966
#different 6 0.2853854654662907 0.18898048915599963 #different 7
0.28196058132165136 0.28196058132165136 8 0.31473956032575623
0.1958710201604552 #different 9 0.33588303670653136
0.2101641630182972 #different 10 0.4075242509025311
0.2997807499800962 #different 15 0.4391771087975972
0.4391771087975972 20 0.3837789445609818 0.2713167833345173
#different 25 0.4252154334940311 0.4252154334940311 30
0.4256407777477492 0.4256407777477492 35 0.45314944605858387
0.45314944605858387 40 0.4278633233755064 0.4278633233755064 45
0.46174762022239796 0.46174762022239796 50 0.45370452524846866
0.45370452524846866|
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn>
This might be because current version of libsvm used in scikit is
3.10 from 2011. With some patch imported from upstream.
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn
mailing list [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn>
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
I don't think it is so easy, version which is used in scikit-learn has
many additional modifications.
from header of svm.cpp: /* Modified 2010: - Support for dense data
by Ming-Fang Weng - Return indices for support vectors, Fabian
Pedregosa <[email protected]> - Fixes to avoid name
collision, Fabian Pedregosa - Add support for instance weights,
Fabian Pedregosa based on work by Ming-Wei Chang, Hsuan-Tien Lin,
Ming-Hen Tsai, Chia-Hua Ho and Hsiang-Fu Yu,
<http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvmtools/#weights_for_data_instances>.
- Make labels sorted in svm_group_classes, Fabian Pedregosa. */
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
