Point taken. G
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 05:29:34PM +1000, Joel Nothman wrote: > There's a PR about handling missing values in RF, and a PR about imputing with > more sophistication than a single, global feature-wise statistic, but nothing > about RF imputation. > On 19 June 2017 at 16:13, Gael Varoquaux <gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> > wrote: > > I misspoke. I didn't mean that there is a reason not to support it, > > just that there are no current plans to support it and that we would > > welcome a willing contributor to get it rolling. > I thought that there was a PR looking at it? > Gaël > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn -- Gael Varoquaux Researcher, INRIA Parietal NeuroSpin/CEA Saclay , Bat 145, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette France Phone: ++ 33-1-69-08-79-68 http://gael-varoquaux.info http://twitter.com/GaelVaroquaux _______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
