On 6/16/18 00:59, Robert Kern wrote:
I have made a significant revision. In this version, downstream projects like
scikit-learn should experience significantly less forced churn.
https://github.com/rkern/numpy/blob/nep/rng-clarification/doc/neps/nep-0019-rng-policy.rst
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2018-June/078252.html
The screaming has died down on numpy-discussion, and it seems like everyone who
has participated over there has more or less come to consensus about accepting
this NEP. However, I'd really appreciate it if I could get some kind of feedback
from a scikit-learn dev, whether it's "I don't care" or "I need a couple of days
to get around to reading the NEP" or just "+1" or "-1000; this is awful!"
I'm not picky.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
