Hi Andy, +1 from me as well :)
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 8:54 PM Jacob Schreiber <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 from me as well. Thanks for putting in the time to write this all out. > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 4:54 PM Hanmin Qin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (personally I still think it's better to keep the flow chart, it seems >> useful for beginners) >> >> Hanmin Qin >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Alexandre Gramfort <[email protected]> >> To: Scikit-learn mailing list <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn governance document >> Date: 2019-02-11 01:29 >> >> +1 for me too >> >> Alex >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:06 PM Gilles Louppe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Andy, >> >> I read through to document. Even though I have not been really active >> these past months/years, I think it summarizes well our governance >> model. >> >> +1. >> >> Gilles >> >> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 12:01, Adrin <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > Thanks for the work you've put in it! >> > >> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 03:00 Andreas Mueller <[email protected] wrote: >> >> >> >> Hey all. >> >> >> >> I want to call a vote on the final version on the scikit-learn >> >> governance document, which can be found in this PR: >> >> >> >> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/12878 >> >> >> >> It underwent some significant changes in the last couple of weeks. >> >> >> >> The two-sentence summary is: conflicts are resolved by vote among core >> >> devs, with a technical committee resolving anything that can not be >> >> decided by at least a 2/3 majority. The initial technical committee is >> >> Alexander Gramfort, Olivier Grisel, Joel Nothman, Hanmin Qin, Gaël >> >> Varoquaux and myself (Andreas Müller). >> >> >> >> I would ask all of the *core developers* to either vote +1 for the >> >> governance doc, -1 against it, or to explicitly abstain here on the >> >> public mailing list (which is the way any vote will be conducted >> >> according to the new governance document). >> >> >> >> I suggest we leave the vote open for two weeks, so that the decision is >> >> made before the sprint and we can take actions. >> >> >> >> Anyone can still comment on the PR or here, though I would rather not >> >> make more changes as this has already been discussed to some length. >> >> >> >> Thank you for participating, >> >> >> >> Andy >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> scikit-learn mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > scikit-learn mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-learn mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >> >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-learn mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-learn mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >> > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
