My preference would be for (1). I don't think the sub-namespace in (2) is necessary, and don't like (3), as I would prefer the plotting functions to be all in the same namespace sklearn.plot.
Andrew <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> J. Andrew Howe, PhD LinkedIn Profile <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ahowe42> ResearchGate Profile <http://www.researchgate.net/profile/John_Howe12/> Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-1990> Github Profile <http://github.com/ahowe42> Personal Website <http://www.andrewhowe.com> I live to learn, so I can learn to live. - me <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:40 PM Hanmin Qin <qinhanmin2...@sina.com> wrote: > See https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/13448 > > We've introduced several plotting functions (e.g., plot_tree and > plot_partial_dependence) and will introduce more (e.g., > plot_decision_boundary) in the future. Consequently, we need to decide > where to put these functions. Currently, there're 3 proposals: > > (1) sklearn.plot.plot_YYY (e.g., sklearn.plot.plot_tree) > > (2) sklearn.plot.XXX.plot_YYY (e.g., sklearn.plot.tree.plot_tree) > > (3) sklearn.XXX.plot.plot_YYY (e.g., sklearn.tree.plot.plot_tree, note > that we won't support from sklearn.XXX import plot_YYY) > > Joel Nothman, Gael Varoquaux and I decided to post it on the mailing list > to invite opinions. > > Thanks > > Hanmin Qin > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
