I'm broadly supportive, but just wanted to note our challenges with mentoring GSoC in the past:
- Limited mentor availability should not be a big issue now. - Need to focus on a single project may not be well aligned with Scikit-learn's goals, or may not yield optimal code results. - Reviewers may feel compelled to expedite the merge of materials not clearly up to standard or useful. - Needs to be an investment in someone who would continue involvement with the project. In this case it's not clear whether having ongoing involvement is as essential an outcome for the project to be worthwhile. Given the relatively large base of funded contributors / core devs at the moment, there may be a challenge finding projects with low assumed knowledge, at least if they involve code. J On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 03:50, Adrin <adrin.jal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > During EuroScipy, we had a few discussions regarding diversity in open > source in general, and > one of the ways some projects have tried to improve that has been through > participation in the > Outreachy program (https://www.outreachy.org/). I'd be happy to mentor > somebody if they apply. > > Would that be okay if we apply? The deadline has just passed, but if > they're flexible, we may > be able to still apply. > > Thanks, > Adrin. > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
