I assume that we need to check which feature could be used. For instance, providing automatic description in PRs could be something that I kind of like. Proposing non-regression tests for new comers that never wrote some could also be useful.
At the end, we will always add manual reviews before merging. The 1 billion dollars question is “is Copilot X can accelerate or ease the contribution or reviewing process”? Cheers, > On 25 Mar 2023, at 20:49, Lynn Bradshaw <readyready15...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm disinclined to use it, barring extensive human review, because of chats > I've had like this > > <Screenshot 2023-03-19 at 20-47-32 ChatGPT.png> > > On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 3:43 PM Adrin <adrin.jal...@gmail.com > <mailto:adrin.jal...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> What do we think of GitHub copilot for PRs? >> >> Had anybody tried it? Is it something we think is a good idea at this point? >> >> I'm gonna try it on some smaller repos and see what it does. >> >> https://github.com/features/preview/copilot-x >> >> Cheers, >> Adrin >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-learn mailing list >> scikit-learn@python.org <mailto:scikit-learn@python.org> >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
