This sounds quite related to our parameter validation stuff. Thought I'd share.
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Ewout ter Hoeven via Scientific Python < nore...@discuss.scientific-python.org> Date: Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 9:57 AM Subject: Re: [SP] Standardized system for parameter management across Scientific Python libraries To: <adrin.jal...@gmail.com> EwoutH <https://discuss.scientific-python.org/u/ewouth> September 12 Yes, a library might be the right implementation solution here. I was thinking of a spec to get the requirements and capabilities right for a wide set of repos, since this is not technically difficult to build (it’s can probably be just a dataclass with a few helper methods), but it’s difficult to get the format right and get everybody aligned. ------------------------------ Visit Topic <https://discuss.scientific-python.org/t/standardized-system-for-parameter-management-across-scientific-python-libraries/1422/5> or reply to this email to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, click here <https://discuss.scientific-python.org/email/unsubscribe/da04c0dffea3cf72ed732ace554f86d8723b1461420c060bb136f4457a52a1aa> .
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
