Neil Hodgson wrote:
I think implementing this as minor changes is doomed to many bugs. I'm imagining the movie version of Starship Troopers here.
All right - without commenting on any large arachnids (or other creepy-crawlies), further contemplation and testing suggest that this *may* end up breaking too many of your invariants in Scintilla... so I withdraw my request for consideration to relax the multiple-entry restrictions at this time. :)
Sigh. Since what was driving this is trying to keep the assigning of read-only attributes to "magic" comments more-or-less synchronous with the user's actions, I am now examining just *how* much of a Bad Idea(tm) it is to do this in the OCaml lexer itself. ;)
BTW, I am not abandoning the "official caret-legal positions in protected ranges" code using a new indicator style - this still has a purpose, *if* I can achieve a satisfactory use of protected mode.
Robert Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rftp.com _______________________________________________ Scintilla-interest mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scintilla-interest
