Iago Rubio wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 13:57 -0800, Robert Roessler wrote:
Neil Hodgson wrote:
Robert Roessler:
The point that is still concerning me is an
"implementation detail" with OCaml: *interpreted* programs MAY access
their external libraries as .so/.dll files, but *compiled* programs
MUST have everything statically linked...
SO, in the statically-linked case, will just switching active
documents be enough to maintain instance independence with multiple
Scintilla widgets, or is there non-document statically allocated
memory that will be shared in an undesirable way? Note that I am
happy to share configuration things like fonts, styles, colors, etc.
Cssed is statically linked and uses one Scintilla control per
GtkNotebook page.
I don't see the problem here.
There isn't one... now that I know that other standard forms of SciTE
do not *require* the use of Scintilla as a "shared object" to get
proper multi-instance behavior. ;)
Robert Roessler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rftp.com
_______________________________________________
Scintilla-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scintilla-interest
