"Neil Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Projects based on Scintilla have been using indicators to mark > areas of text that contain errors, search matches, URL hotspots, > misspellings, etc. These areas are discovered through some user > initiated command or by running a background process rather than as > part of lexing. Such marks are often fairly sparse: a HTML syntax > checker may show 5 errors in a whole file. Its a little complex using > indicators in this way as the lexing state has to be preserved while > setting the indicator and there is only 1 to 3 bits available for this > state. [snip]
Sounds great to me. Allowing so many indicators would allow for syntax highlighting while also supporting SubEthaEdit-like pair/group programming (something I've been looking to add to my scintilla-based editor for quite a while), along with different colors for console stdout/stderr/expected input in shells (also something I've been looking to add for a while). Thank you for considering this. - Josiah _______________________________________________ Scintilla-interest mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scintilla-interest
