On Mon, Feb 19, 2024, 19:28 Gabriel Fougeron <gabriel.fouge...@hotmail.fr>
wrote:

> > Do you think it would be possible to develop your examples to the point
> where it's an easier tutorial for us.
>
> On the other hand, dealing with the LowLevelCallable in your own code is a
> mess! Especially (like I did) if you want to somewhat abstract the return
> type of the function (for the purposes of integrating scalar and vector
> functions for instance). The code I came up with is much too verbose and
> cluttered to my liking.
>

I was talking about using a lowlevelcallable from Python code, much like
what your example shows.



> AND there is the issue that I raised a few months ago which attracted
> little attention. Cf https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/19148
> Until this issue has been addressed, users won't be able to use
> LowLevelCallable without my dirty workaround anyways, so having a nice
> tutorial is counter productive.
> This being said, I would be thrilled to contribute with a nice tutorial
> once this roadblock has been lifted.
>
> I think that's ok, but I don't know how to make those files available.
_______________________________________________
SciPy-Dev mailing list -- scipy-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scipy-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/scipy-dev.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to