george fotheringay wrote:
But there's nothing in the SciTE documentation to suggest this is the case. SciTEDoc.html badly needs rewriting. This is not the first time I've found that what it says is misleading, or worse, wrong. Here it
You know, that's an open source program, maintained on free time of contributors. So if you find areas needing an overhaul, don't hesitate to point them out like you did, or even better, to provide a rewriting!
I do both from time to time, and Neil happily integrate any relevant change. -- Philippe Lhoste -- (near) Paris -- France -- http://Phi.Lho.free.fr -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- _______________________________________________ Scite-interest mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scite-interest
