Le Monday 28 January 2002 � 09:28:19, David Corcoran a �crit:
> > why don't you licence the skeleton as public domain ?
> 
> Last time I checked BSD was a public domain license.

BSD is not a public domain licence or maybe you can give me pointers (I
am not a lawyer).

According to [1]:
 � Public Domain.

   Being in the public domain is not a license--rather, it means the
   material is not copyrighted and no license is needed. Practically
   speaking, though, if a work is in the public domain, it might as well
   have an all-permissive non-copyleft free software license. Public domain
   status is compatible with the GNU GPL. �

And according to [2]:
 � For the most part, the software constituting the NetBSD operating
   system is not in the public domain; its authors retain their copyright. �

Your licence imposes restrictions and a copyright. So it cannot be
considered Public Domain.

I agree that using a Public Domain licence for the skeleton may be a
good idea if you want it to be used in proprietary codes (that may be
limited by your publicity clause).

Regards,


[1] http://www.fsf.org/licenses/license-list.html
[2] http://www.netbsd.org/Goals/redistribution.html

-- 
 Dr. Ludovic Rousseau                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- Normaliser Unix c'est comme pasteuriser le Camembert, L.R. --
***************************************************************
Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
http://www.linuxnet.com/
To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe sclinux
***************************************************************

Reply via email to